This is a concept for your review. Nothing here is built or in use yet.
Getting a hundred notes signed

This is the part we haven't solved

You just walked through the demo, and it showed one patient. You see a hundred a day. The question you asked the whole way through — how many minutes does approving a hundred notes cost you? — hasn't been answered anywhere else in this concept. It shouldn't be dodged here either.

💯

The number problem

Every screen we've shown you has six or eleven patients on it, because that's what fits a mockup. Your day has closer to a hundred. Whatever approving one note costs, multiply it by a hundred and it's a different problem entirely — one we haven't sized for you honestly yet.

😮‍💨

The timing problem

It's not only the number of minutes. Most of those hundred notes land at the end of a day of consulting, when you're tired. A tired doctor approving a hundred notes quickly isn't just an inconvenience — it's a clinical risk. Solving the count without solving the timing doesn't solve this.

What we won't do

No note is ever signed without you reading it

This much we'll commit to now, before anything else on this page: notes are never auto-approved. It's your signature and your responsibility, on your patient's record. If none of the ideas below suit your day, the honest fallback is that you read every one of the hundred, in full — slower, but never quietly made the default just to make the number smaller.

Ways to spread the load — pick, combine, or reject

We'd rather ask you than guess

None of these are decided. Each one trades something against something else, and you're the only one who knows your day well enough to say which trade is worth making. Tell us using the feedback button — which of these fits, which doesn't, and what we're missing.

1

Approve between patients

A note is usually ready in the minute or so after a visit ends — not the whole visit, just that patient's note. Approve it in the gap before the next patient walks in, and it never piles up.

CostsSmall interruptions threaded through the day, instead of one long session at the end.
RiskReading a note in a short gap, between patients, may itself be rushed reading — the exact problem this is meant to avoid.
2

Read closely only the ones the system flagged

The system marks the notes it was unsure about — an unclear name, a dosage it couldn't catch cleanly. Those get your careful attention; the rest get a quicker check.

CostsNothing extra if the flagging is trustworthy — that's the whole benefit.
RiskIt depends entirely on the flagging being trustworthy, and we can't honestly promise that yet. A missed flag means a quick check on a note that needed a careful one.
3

Approve from a short summary

Two or three lines per visit on the approval screen, with the full note one tap away if you want it. Much faster to move through a hundred of them.

CostsNothing in time — this is the fast option.
RiskWe have to say this plainly: you'd be signing something you haven't read in full. That's a real risk, not a hidden one.
4

A first pass by your staff

Your receptionist checks that a note is complete and attached to the right patient — never the clinical content, that's not their call. You still read and sign every note yourself.

CostsSomeone else on your team sees the notes before you do. It reduces the time you spend hunting for mistakes — it doesn't reduce your reading or your signing.
RiskOnly useful alongside another option here — it doesn't touch the number of notes you personally have to read.
5

Review at the end of the day, on a bigger screen

A desktop or tablet at the front desk or in your office, instead of a phone — reading a hundred notes is generally faster on a bigger screen with a keyboard nearby.

CostsYou need to sit down somewhere with that screen before you leave — one more thing between you and going home.
RiskIt's still a hundred notes, at the exact moment you're most tired. A faster screen doesn't fix the timing problem.
6

Say "approve" instead of tapping

If it genuinely helps, approving by voice instead of finding and tapping a button on a screen — one less physical action, a hundred times.

CostsOnly worth building if it actually saves you something over tapping — worth testing before committing to it.
RiskSpeaking "approve" out loud a hundred times a day carries the same rushed-signature risk as tapping fast. It changes the action, not necessarily the care behind it.
The honest position

This is the part we haven't solved yet, and we'd rather ask you than guess. Which of these fits your day? Use the feedback button in the corner — pick one, combine a few, or tell us they're all wrong and why.

Back
← Demo
Your reaction